Coming from the main article: inculcation, you have seen how deep things are. So now we go back and focus on the details.

starting out

Life is very non-linear, but arguments should not be circular.

Philosophy: construct spaces and do algebra, analysis, geometry, and whatever we want to do!

  • the idea is to create meaning, objects out of nothing…, even in familiar spaces and then going to unfamiliar ones!
  • reminder: nothing (even rigor) is more scary than doing wrong stuff!

We start with logic and set theory, do analysis, algebra, geometry and topology: there is no actual distinction between their build-up, only in their vibes.

  • build the grounds
    • construct propositional logic
    • construct first order based on propositional logic
    • construct ZFC set theory based on first order logic
  • build structures on sets (or beyond) and work inside
    • inside
    • studying groups
    • out on metric spaces
    • inside or vector spaces
      • out on normed -vector spaces, inner product spaces
    • out on rings and fields
    • in graphs
    • out on categories
    • Out on topological spaces
    • Out on measure spaces
    • out on smooth manifolds
      • smooth manifolds with more structures
    • out on infinite dim spaces

finite groups

little things: groups, group actions

One should start their journey with groups!

More into doing more algebra

Link to original

Inside the reals and metric spaces

Real analysis, task 1

We must set theoretically construct(!!), starting from , and then .

Real analysis, task 2

  • Define sequences, and the definition of limits of sequences.
  • Try to prove that converges to as

  • Metric spaces with the intuition of

    • Sequences and series
    • limits of functions, continuous functions
    • get motivated for topological spaces: prove the theorem that a function is continuous if and only if preimage of open sets is open

Inside finite dim vector spaces

We do more inside and venture slightly out to do analysis in finite-dim real normed vector spaces, which are of course linearly bijective to .

Diffferential geometry of submanifolds of

lecturenotes diffgeo.pdf (ethz.ch) One can distinguish extrinsic differential geometry and intrinsic differential geometry. The former restricts attention to submanifolds of Euclidean space while the latter studies manifolds equipped with a Riemannian metric. The extrinsic theory is more accessible because we can visualize curves and surfaces in , but some topics can best be handled with the intrinsic theory…

But a better thing to do is directly jump to smooth manifolds altogether…

Over rings

AKA rings and modules

There are usually three

  • first course on rings and modules
    • linear algebra after doing rings and modules

      A -vector space with a endomorphism (fancy name for linear map ) gives a -module structure on , so we can directly use -modules classification theorems to construct the theorems on canonical forms.

      I am still looking on how to understand two linear endomorphisms giving a structure on . At the least, I can re-interpret the theorem that says “we always have a common eigenvector of two commuting linear maps” as the following

      Let’s say we have a -module defined by two linear endomorphisms . Then we always have at least one simple non-trivial -submodule of .

      Link to original
  • commutative algebra
  • (non-commutative) algebraic structures

representation theory of finite groups

There are different levels to study representation theory of finite groups:

  • before doing finite groups when one has basic ideas of matrices/linear algebra one may try to ponder on
    • consider a finite set of matrices which are closed under multiplication and has inverses:
    • easy example is for an invertible matrix consider the set

this set might be finite or infinite, if this is finite then for some , then what can we say about the matrix - Try to prove that if the field is (or any algebraically closed field) must be diagonalizable. - Find what the eigenvalues of may be if the field is . -

representation theory is just spicy linear algebra

A group homomorphism from a (say, finite for now) group to the general linear group on a vector space

is called a representation of the group . One can classify and study such homomorphisms (upto an equivalence ofcourse) and it’s called representation theory (of finite groups). This “helps” in doing linear algebra when we have a invertible linear map , in my opinion.

Link to original

  • after doing finite groups and linear algebra it is easy to study representation theory of finite groups any text like
    • book Artin
    • book Fulton Harris
    • book Dummit and Foote covers all the introductory theory
  • after doing rings and modules the same theory hits different
    • rephrase everything about representations of a group with its group algebra
  • after doing commutative algebra

Over fields

AKA fields and galois theory

Out on measure spaces and infinite dim vector spaces

AKA functional analysis, abstract measure theory, probability theory

Out on topological spaces

AKA the fields of topology, algebraic topology

First semester course on Topology (AKA general topology/point set topology): as opposed to cute topology, we prove more content here

First semester course on Algebraic topology: study of holes in topological spaces

We learn homotopy groups, homology groups and at last cohomology groups!

Out on smooth manifolds

AKA “intrinsic differential geometry” or analysis on manifolds.

May try lectures Frederic Schuller -International Winter School on Gravity and Light 2015 without any other context or to get into it fully: inculcation-smooth-manifolds.

Out on Riemannian manifolds

Working with topological groups and Lie groups

Lie groups are famous. There are different levels to study Lie groups:

  • after doing finite groups one may try to study matrix Lie groups, using knowledge of multivariable calculus, it is not ideal
  • after doing topology, smooth manifolds you must already know definitions of topological and Lie groups along with their Lie algebras and exponential map
  • after doing algebraic topology you will start understanding what simply connected Lie groups allow that its quotients by discrete subgroups don’t

There are references here: inculcation-lie-groups

Out on algebraic varieties